Q: When you started in 2022 you said “really excited to work on projects full time, focusing on not just CSM students but all UAL students.” As we near the end of your term of office, what ways has your thoughts about the role changed?
A: Yeah it’s been a very interesting year and I’ve spent a lot of time with the other colleges this year. My heart will always be with CSM as their officer and understanding the students there and the college. I’ve been able to reach students at other colleges through our events and other opportunities such as our Food Parcels project that we managed to expand to all the other colleges this year and that was really nice and exciting to be able to offer the project to more students. Additionally, with our Degree Show, we were able to expand that across the Six UAL colleges.
Being a dedicated college officer doesn’t necessarily mean that all of your work will be focused on that college, but being able to link up with other colleges and fellow college officers, being in spaces and having conversations about the experiences of UAL students allows you to see patterns across all colleges and that will change how you engage with students on the issues affecting them and how the officer team works together.
Q: Overall, how do you feel about your time as CSM Officer?
A: It’s been a really great time; when I joined, it was the first year of the SU’s transition from four remit-based officers to six officers, with a dedicated officer for each college. A lot more time could be spent on that specific college and building relations. CSM also had a new head of college and a new executive team, so I had to build strong relationships with those stakeholders, such as meeting with our head of college and discussing our priorities for the year. I’ve also been close with our Associate Dean of Student Experience, who has been a great help in navigating this role and is very well-connected and responsive to the issues affecting students, allowing me to pick up on things quicker.
Q: What were some memorable moments this year?
A: The first big one for me is the lecture / panel I hosted with Zarina Muhammad from The White Pube and Sof (LCC Officer 2022 – 2024), which was focused around critiquing the crit. This was something I had wanted to do since becoming an officer. I’m a big fan of The White Pube, they’re an art critic duo who came from my course at CSM (Fine Art) and they are really involved in a lot of discussions about how to improve the art world and by extension the experiences of students who are making their way in the art world. The session was really insightful and I learned a lot, and really grateful that I was able to do the event and am very proud.
Also, everything Katwamba (LCF Officer 2023-2025) and I did for LGBTQIA+ History Month in February was top-tier, in my opinion. We had a lot of other commitments going on in February as well, so we stuck to what was within our capacity but did the very best, choosing quality over quantity. The feedback and attendance we had at all our events (specifically the opening night of our exhibition at CSM with the after-party at Queer Britain) really reflected that. Most of the feedback we received noted that the events felt like a safe space, and overall, that was my goal.
The food parcel project is also a big achievement, as we wanted to create a way to support students during the Cost of Living crisis, and the feedback we received allowed us to know we are making a positive impact for students during a difficult time.
Q: Was there anything you wanted to do, but ran out of time?
A: Specifically the policy paper that was written around crits. Overall, I am really happy but think there are many ways that objective could have gone further.
I worked with the SU team and many people from UAL to create this guidance document for staff about how to conduct a safe and inclusive crit, and I think the fact that it was co-authored by both the SU and an executive at UAL highlighted the importance of this work. At the moment, it’s in the process of being distributed, and I’m excited to see where that goes, but I think if I had more time to focus on it, I would have liked to develop student guidance as well. What we’ve done with this re-imagining of crits to make them safe and inclusive is a huge achievement.
Q: In your time here as an officer and employee of Arts SU, what have you learned?
A: SO MUCH! This is my first full time job and I’ve learned many things. I’ve learned to have confidence in myself, as it’s a role where you can easily feel imposter syndrome very heavily due to how quick you are put into high levels of responsibilities (e.g becoming Charity Trustee’s) that you must take seriously as we’re talking about legal responsibilities (Staffing / HR, Finance, Charity law).
Particularly for me, where I was focused on only my degree with my art practice, knowing that what I’m doing isn’t just for me or the other officers but thinking about what decisions will benefit our 20,000+ students.
A lot of it takes practice, such as developing my organising and administrative skills which I improved on by practicing. I’ve also learned to set boundaries for myself so I can have work-life balance.
Q: What advice would you give to people who want to become the next CSM officer?
A: There’s so much I could say. The role will always be what you make of it and your individual experiences and feelings will shape the role.
Regarding potentially feeling the imposter syndrome, it’s good to remember that there will always be someone in this role, and they’ll always be a student. They might not have had a lot of life experience or been a course/school representative; sometimes, it can be someone like me, a student who is very passionate about improving their course or UAL – which is all you need.
There is always going to be someone in this role, so why not you? If you think you can make a difference, you probably can.
You’ll naturally step away from your artistic practice to take on a role with wider responsibilities, so you’ll find ways to integrate your creativity into the role.
OFFICER OBJECTIVES
Objective Title: Cost Of Living: Continue work on the Cost of Living campaign to expand and solidify existing projects to ensure longevity at Arts SU. This will include making the free food parcels project more financially sustainable; continuing art supply giveaways; expanding the degree show sustainability funding; run a digital campaign for visibility and money saving tips.
Progress: These actions have been completed, and funding has been secured to continue the food parcel projects and to create a future role at the Students’ Union to oversee projects relating to ‘basic student needs’ (such as food, transport, etc.).
The Art Supply giveaway event a couple months ago and it was successful with over 300 students attending. We received positive feedback on the giveaway, and conversations about continuing the Art Supply giveaway tradition took place.
The degree show fund also went really well, with positive feedback and are excited to see the photos from the artists.
Digital Campaign: Digital promotions took place during Student Money Week and connected with the Union Affairs Officer around a digital campaign for food prices at UAL. I’ve made various guides around money tips, food, and art materials.
Objective Title: Continue work on the safe crits campaign to expand and solidify the existing projects to ensure longevity at Arts SU and the University. This will involve running our own safe crits with the SU, networking and getting student and staff feedback (forums, workshops, committees, school reps and other institutions), lobbying UAL to make crits part of the education strategy. Finally the campaign will develop a written document about what is the ‘UAL crit’ and what is the guidance for staff and students to ensure there are safe space crits in class.
Progress: Complete. Policy passed at UAL to ensure crits are safe and inclusive, staff guide has been written, and the Student Guide for crits coming soon.
Objective Title: Use the various channels of communication between CSM staff, the SU and students to talk about how they want to build community and collaborations. For existing community projects I’ll look at how can they be improved to implement the student voice more and identify which student groups need more community support
Progress: Ongoing. I was part of the Undergraduate and Postgraduate collaborative units working group at CSM. The collaborative units (aka Creative Unions) are the modules in which students from different courses collaborate and create group projects.
Most feedback from these projects is controversial from staff and students, and I wanted to find out why. Most people don’t have a good experience with these units and feel it takes away from their art practice and why they are being done.
I don’t think there is any direct changes yet, but raising student feedback was the catalyst to starting these conversations, as it was the first time the SU had been involved in these working groups.
Objective Title: LGBTQ+ History Month
Progress: We had the exhibition at CSM and had a nice mix of students from different courses and levels who had never met before. When they met on the opening evening, I had an artist panel with four of the artists who discussed their work and had a Q&A. It was nice to see people coming together, and through that, they had a lot of connections and common interests. We ran an online crit afterwards where the artists felt comfortable candidly talking about their identity and heritage and how that was sometimes misunderstood by other classmates and teaching staff, and the crit was able to be a safe space to voice their frustrations and the artists mentioned how they previously didn’t feel able to discuss so candidly about their experiences which was so valuable.
I also held a film screening evening at close-up cinema in Shoreditch who were an amazing organisation to work with. That day had horrible weather on a Thursday evening and I was concerned that people might not attend in the pouring rain but we filled out the whole cinema. Just to see people showing up and bringing their friends along to the film screening was so good. Afterwards, a lot of the film-makers were standing in the bar area swapping contact information, and at that moment, I realised that I’d created a natural networking environment where everyone could come together and share the enjoyment of each other’s work.